[Bob’s Private Session #140 Lincoln’s Assassination Sept. 5, 2009 (33:38 mark)]
Bob: What you just said: “The convergence of the Chip, TV, Astral, and Physical-Chemical Body creates the Mystery Landscape, or unfolds the Mystery Landscape”. So, are we saying the tachyons are going to be the particles for the Mystery Landscape?
iON: No, the tachyons are going to undo all the rules regarding the Bodies because tachyons go faster than your recordable speed of light.
Bob: Yeah, it goes past the rules of the Chip Body and the chip technology.
iON: Well, yes! And even the Chemical Body – because once you dispel time, then you no longer have to age.
Bob: Is that faster than the Astral Body?
iON: It is.
Bob: Hmm, that’s interesting. OK then…
iON: But now, wait a second! Think about what you just said: “Is that faster than the Astral Body”. Well, if the tachyon process dispels time itself, and you no longer have to age, how could that be faster than the Astral Body – if there is no gauge of time in the temporal experience of the quantitative place of attaching time to your formulas, and rules, and regulations? It actually slows it down faster than the Astral Body because the Astral Body now becomes a fixed place that you judge your other Bodies in proportion toward.
Bob: First of all, I would say that Kent and the Indians are trying to retrieve the Astral Body because they can’t take the speed of the tachyon body.
iON: Pretty much, yes. And what that’s doing is concentrating the flow.
Bob: Yeah, and I wanted to say just… we’re having a very good point here because I don’t know if iON knows that I understand this. The Astral Body is where you go supposedly when you go into the Non-Physical. But, if the Non-Physical is merged with the Physical – we don’t need an Astral Body – and the tachyon is the particle representing the “complete thinning of the veil”.
iON: Yes! And now, let’s be clear! So they don’t blow you up when they start listening to this. It’s not the tachyon. It’s the “tachyon pulse”.
Bob: Pulse, it’s not a particle. It’s a pulse; it’s a relationship.
iON: Correct!
Bob: It’s tactility – it’s a kind of dialectic.
[Melting Titanium 60 June 1, 2010 (18:15 mark)]
iON: Another question from the audience: they want a clean bill of health on this “tachyon” business.
Bob: Would you like to go into that, then?
iON: I’ll give it the show version. It’s the play – the interplay at a sub-nano structure that has an effect on the larger cellular… I guess you would say: “reality”, because that’s what it is all subject to. So, you can have a difference or a new experience of it being validated.
Bob: That could be validated.
iON: Your reason to do it would be to validate it, yes.
Bob: So, the tachyon is just a deeper stream of gratitude.
iON: That’s a very great way to say it, but your science folks are going to tear that up.
Bob: Why do you have a psychological implied condition – “abject” – when talking about substance?
iON: Because that is what substance is created by.
Bob: And, that’s what I meant that a tachyon is a deeper stream of gratitude.
iON: And that’s why we agreed.
